Student Teaching: Content Area Methods Unit Plan Assessment

Content Area Methods-Unit Planning Assessment

STUDENT INFORMATION

P ID

Student First Name

Student Last Name

Grade Level

Program 1

Level

Term

OVERVIEW OF EVALUATION INSTRUMENT

Millersville University uses the same criteria in the content area unit planning evaluation as the “Planning” domain used for practicing teachers in the Pennsylvania Department of Education Educator Effectiveness system. Distinguished is a goal to strive for but is not available for rating since distinguished is not a level that student teachers can potentially demonstrate.

RATING

Unsatisfactory - The teacher candidate does not meet performance expectations required for teaching.
Basic - The teacher candidate is performing at the basic level and is demonstrating partially proficient professional practices at this point in the clinical experience.
Proficient - The teacher candidate’s performance is substantially demonstrated at this point in the clinical experience at the professional level.

Please use the MU Adapted Danielson Rubric for the specific criteria associated with each component.

UNIT PLANNING

1. Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy:

Comments:

2. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students:

Comments:

3. Setting Instructional Outcomes:

Comments:

4. Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources:

Comments:

5. Designing Coherent Instruction:

Comments:

6. Designing Student Assessments:

Comments:

EVALUATOR AFFIRMATION

Evaluator Signature

Click to Sign...

Date

Supervisor/Evaluator Email (To receive confirmation)

I hereby affirm that the information in this document is correct and true to the best of my knowledge.